Posts

Showing posts from July, 2008

Security is a Process, not a Product

--> Back in the year 2000, I remember reading an article by Bruce Schneier (a security hero of mine), he said "Security is a Process, not a Product". Bruce talked about whether this would be ever understood. It really struck a chord with me at the time and I've been quoting Bruce saying that ever since in my own presentations. Well 8 years have gone by since I first read it, and Information Security has certainly come to the fore in that time, but Bruce's statement rings truer than ever. http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0005.html I don't want to come across as knocking the security industry because they do provide many great security products and services, but in the industry’s push to sell products and solutions, I think they are help driving the concept, that the answer to all information security problems is to simply buy a product off the shelf. The number of times I've been at security events and conferences, where the “punters” are ...

The NHS just doesn't "do" Information Security

I said this before, and I'll probably say it again a few more times, "The NHS just doesn't "do" Information Security". The latest in a catalogue of NHS breaches involved a Senior Manager who had his laptop stolen, but the laptop held over 21000 records of Essex patients. The same old problem with a laptop breach... 1. No Hard Disk Encryption - Password Protection is almost no protection, it's very easy to bypass Windows passwords, pretty much anyone who can type into Google can manage to achieve it. 2. Poor Information Management. We have a vast amount of Sensitive Data which has been allowed to be "copied" from a central IT system to a laptop. Should the Manager have access to that much information? Should he be allowed to export that much information from the host system? Probably not. Who else can access and take a copy of this data? What's to stop someone putting it onto a £6 flash drive? I have friends who work in the NHS, th...